Where is the Chauvet and Lascaux caves located?

Where is the Chauvet and Lascaux caves located?


What is the most famous prehistoric sculpture?

The artifact known as the Venus of Willendorf dates to between 000 B.C.E., making it one of the oldest and most famous surviving works of art.

What is significant about Lascaux bird headed man?

Why the person in the image has the rudimentary head of a bird, and why a bird form sits atop a stick very close to him is a mystery. Some suggest that the person is a shaman—a kind of priest or healer with powers involving the ability to communicate with spirits of other worlds.

What challenge does the study of prehistoric history present?

Social scientists who study prehistoric history face a unique challenge because there is very little evidence from prehistoric times. There are huge gaps of time for which there is no evidence at all.

How might prehistoric artists have used hollow bird bones?

How might prehistoric artists have used hollow bird bones? As a tool to blow paint through. ... They provide clues about life in prehistoric times.

Why do historians read diaries and letters from the past?

2. Primary sources are firsthand evidence that were written/created by the people who saw or experienced the event. Letters, diaries, or government records are primary sources. ... Primary sources help historians learn what people were thinking at the time of an event.

How do we know what happened in the past?

People know what happened in the past by looking at things from the past including sources (like books, newspapers, and letters) and artifacts (like pottery, tools, and human or animal remains.) Libraries, archives, and museums collect and keep these things for people to study history.

Why do historians write about the past?

Historians look for causes and effects that help to explain how and why events happened. They try to see the past through the eyes of the people who lived it. When they study the past, historians ask themselves questions. The answers to the questions help historians draw conclusions about the past.

Why do historians draw different conclusions?

They consider why, where and when a source was created. Why do historians draw different conclusions about events of the past? ... Historians must first look for facts and evidence in their sources and then, they use reasoning to make a judgment or draw a conclusion.

Why do historians disagree with each other?

The reasons why historians disagree are many and varied, but the following represent some of them: Questions of the selection and relevance of evidence. The method and the techniques of history. Ideology and political predisposition.

What experts do historians work with?

Answer Expert Verified archaeologists are experts do historians rely on to provide accurate information about the connection between an artifact and the culture or civilization it belongs to.

What is the best source of historical evidence to learn about how an event unfolded?

Answer Expert Verified The best source of historical evidence to learn about how an event unfolded is a newspaper account written when the event occurred. Newspapers are considered as one of the reliable sources because it delivers facts based on actual events.

What is one negative effect that can come from applying modern values to a historical event?

Contextualization evaluates the events, values, and beliefs of a time period to truly understand why people did what they did in previous time periods. When a historian doesn't use contextualization, an event will be seen worse than it may have been during the actual time period.

Which text is valuable for gaining context about a historical event but is unreliable as evidence?

History novels are valuable to gain the context of history but they are not reliable like a primary source documents.

Why is it so difficult for historians to arrive?

Why is it so difficult for historians to arrive at an interpretation of past events that is universally accepted? A. Ahistorical interpretation is only valid if it was made immediately after an event occurred. ... Many historians refuse to cite their sources when making historical interpretations.

Why do some historians differ in their interpretations of historical events?

Interpretations differ because they are written for different audiences. Historians select information and when they write they can distort information to make their arguments stronger. Historians change their views when they discover new evidence.

Why is this letter an important primary source document?

Answer. Answer: Generally speaking, letters are used as historical evidence or evidence in legal cases. ... This should identify with historical events so that it meets proper arrangement in reading historical events and best source is books.

Is history a fact or opinion?

History contains both fact and opinion. Facts are things that are unchanging and can be objectively verified. Many historical facts are verified by primary sources, which consist of documents and other types of physical items that were created during the time being studied.